Giant aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva causing right ventricular outflow obstruction.

Validation of a new contrast material protocol adapted to body surface area for optimized low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:591–7. 13. Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:635–8. 14. Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1897–907. 15. Schepis T, Koepfli P, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Gaemperli O et al. Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1464–73. 16. Kefer JM, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 2007;17:87–96. 17. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Boogers MJ, Kroft LJ, de Roos A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol 2010;45:331–40. 18. Krueger KD, Mitra AK, DelCore MG, Hunter WJ III, Agrawal DK. A comparison of stent-induced stenosis in coronaryand peripheral arteries. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:575–9. 19. Cademartiri F, Maffie E, Palumbo A, Martini C, Aldrovandi A, Ardissino D et al. CT coronary angiography for the follow-up of coronary stent. Acta Biomed 2010;81: 87–93. 20. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, Baum U, Kuettner A, Ropers U et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2567–72. 21. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECGgated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234–43. 22. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G, Finet G, Pennec PY, Mansourati J et al. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:110–2. 23. Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, Gallagher S, Weinsaft JW. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:246–51. 24. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501–55. 25. Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Rizzo E, Ou P, Brunelle F, Bochud FO et al. Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality—preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:1154–64. 26. Ghadri JR, Goetti R, Fiechter M, Pazhenkottil AP, Kuest SM, Nkoulou RN et al. Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1865–74.